OA

Verwijzen in het nieuws

References

1. Andała, M. (2023). Inclusief taalgebruik in Nederland. Roczniki Humanistyczne, 71(5sp), 159-171.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson, L. (2022, 20juni). Hoe divers zijn we eigenlijk in de journalistiek? Medium. https://medium.com/mediamakersvanmorgen/hoe-divers-zijn-we-eigenlijk-in-de-journalistiek-dc039caab46c
   [Google Scholar]
3. Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Mediatization and sociolinguistic change. Key concepts, research traditions, open issues. In J.Androutsopoulos (Red.), Mediatization and sociolinguistic change (pp. 3-48). De Gruyter Berlin.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barker-Plummer, B. (2013). Fixing Gwen: News and the mediation of (trans)gender challenges. Feminist Media Studies, 13(4), 710-724.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bell, A. (1995). Language and the media. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 23-41.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Billard, T. J. (2016). Writing in the margins: Mainstream news media representations of transgenderism. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4193-4218.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blaubergs, M. S. (1980). An analysis of classic arguments against changing sexist language. Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 3(2-3), 135-147.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Borza, N. (2021). Why shall I call you ze? Discourse analysis of the social perception of institutionally introducing the gender-neutral pronoun ze. Linguistik Online, 106(1), 19-45.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Boutachekourt, K., Schuurmans, A., Jap-Sam, M., & Rubio, S. (2021). Diversiteit in de journalistiek. Naar handelingsstrategieën voor diversiteit en inclusie in de journalistieke sector. Stimuleringsfonds voor de Journalistiek. https://www.svdj.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Eindrapport-Diversiteit-in-de-Journalistiek-def.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bradley, E., Hope, M., & Lombardo, H. (2019). Personality, prescriptivism, and pronouns: Factors influencing grammaticality judgments of gender-neutral language. English Today, 35, 41-52.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Broersma, M. (2010). De transformatie van het journalistieke veld: Discursieve strategieën en journalistieke vormen. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap, 38(3), 268-276.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Collet, T. (2022). Media reception of the gender-neutral pronoun iel in the French and Dutch language presses of Belgium. Canadian Journal of Netherlandic Studies/Revue Canadienne d’Études Néerlandaises, 42(2), 83-109.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Costera Meijer, I. (2019). Journalism, audiences, and news experience. In K.Wahl-Jorgensen & T.Hanitzsch (Red.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 389-405). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cotter, C. (2014). Revising the ‘journalist’s bible’: How news practitioners respond to language and social change. In J.Androutsopoulos (Red.), Mediatization and sociolinguistic change (pp. 371-394). De Gruyter Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dalecki, L., Lasorsa, D. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2009). The news readability problem. Journalism Practice, 3(1), 1-12.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Decock, S., Van Hoof, S., Soens, E., & Verhaegen, H. (2024). The comprehensibility and appreciation of non-binary pronouns in newspaper reporting. The case of hen and die in Dutch. Applied Linguistics45, 330-347.
    [Google Scholar]
18. De Caluwe, J. (2009). Tussentaal wordt omgangstaal in Vlaanderen. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 14(1), 8-25.
    [Google Scholar]
19. De Hingh, V. (2021, 20december). Alles en iedereen is ‘woke’. Maar wat zegt dat nog?De Correspondent. https://decorrespondent.nl/13005/alles-en-iedereen-is-woke-maar-wat-zegt-dat-nog/3b6d8526-452c-0bda-0493-5a16a7f2182c
    [Google Scholar]
20. Dubbeldam, M. (2023, 8mei). ‘Woke pleegt een aanslag op onze vrijheid en gelijkheid’. Ongehoord Nederland. https://web.archive.org/web/20230509032522/https://ongehoordnederland.tv/2023/05/08/laatste-nieuws/woke-pleegt-een-aanslag-op-onze-vrijheid-en-gelijkheid/
    [Google Scholar]
21. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Flanagin, A., & Metzger, M. J. (2017). Digital media and perceptions of source credibility in political communication. In K.Kenski & K. H.Jamieson (Red.), The Oxford handbook of political communication (pp. 417-436). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Fried, M., & Awad, I. (2024). Journalists as mindful users of language (change): Gender-inclusive Spanish in Argentinian news. Journalism Studies, 25(1), 80-98.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Friedrich, M. (2017). Textverständlichkeit und ihre Messung: Entwicklung und Erprobung eines Fragebogens zur Textverständlichkeit. Waxmann Verlag GmbH.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Friedrich, M. C., & Heise, E. (2025). The influence of comprehensibility on interest and comprehension. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 39(1-2), 139-152.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Ghyselen, A.-S. (2021). Eén pot nat? Tussentaal en ander Belgisch Nederlands. Onze Taal, 90(11), 14-17.
    [Google Scholar]
28. GLAAD (2022). GLAAD Media Reference Guide (11th ed.). Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation. https://glaad.org/reference/
    [Google Scholar]
29. Govaert, C., Lagerwerf, L., & Klemm, C. (2020). Deceptive journalism: Characteristics of untrustworthy news items. Journalism Practice, 14(6), 697-713.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Grezel, J. E. (2020). “Voor mij is hen heel gewoon”. De soepele introductie van een genderneutraal voornaamwoord in Zweden. Onze Taal, 89(10), 8-10.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Gustafsson Sendén, M., Bäck, E. A., & Lindqvist, A. (2015). Introducing a genderneutral pronoun in a natural gender language: The influence of time on attitudes and behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 893.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Gustafsson Sendén, M., Lindholm, T., & Sikström, S. (2014). Biases in news media as reflected by personal pronouns in evaluative contexts. Social Psychology, 45(2), 103-111.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., de Rooij, J. & Van den Toorn, M. (1997). 5.2.2 Persoon en getal (versie 2.1). Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. https://e-ans.ivdnt.org/topics/pid/ans050202lingtopic
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hekanaho, L. (2022). A thematic analysis of attitudes towards English nonbinary pronouns. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 11(2), 190-216.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Hermansson, A. (2023). Processing predicate NPs: An EEG study [Master’s thesis, Lund University]. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9136979/file/9136986.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
36. Hernandez, E. E. (2020). Pronouns, prescriptivism, and prejudice: Attitudes toward the singular ‘they’, prescriptive grammar, and nonbinary transgender people [Master’s thesis, Purdue University]. https://doi.org/10.25394/PGS.12231095.v1
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hord, L. C. R. (2016). Bucking the linguistic binary: Gender neutral language in English, Swedish, French, and German. Western Papers in Linguistics / Cahiers Linguistiques de Western, 3(1), Article 4. https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/wpl_clw/article/view/966
    [Google Scholar]
38. Huijnk, W. (2022). Opvattingen over seksuele en genderdiversiteit in Nederland en Europa 2022. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. https://www.scp.nl/publicaties/publicaties/2022/05/17/opvattingen-over-seksuele-en-genderdiversiteit-in-nederland-en-europa-2022
    [Google Scholar]
39. Irigaray, L. (2004). ‘Love of the other’. In L. F.Rakow & L. A.Wackwitz (Red.), Feminist communication theory: Selections in context (pp. 159-168). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Kamenova, D. (2014). Media and othering: How media discourse on migrants reflects and affects society’s tolerance. Politické Vedy, 17(2), 170-184.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kieskompas (2023). Kieskompas. https://tweedekamer2023.kieskompas.nl/nl/results/compass
    [Google Scholar]
42. Lang, A. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 57-80.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Li, M. (2019). (Mis)matching: Journalistic uses of gender pronouns and names can influence implicit attitudes toward transgender people, perceived news content credibility, and perceived reporter professionalism. Newspaper Research Journal, 40(4), 517-533.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Morgenroth, T., Gustafsson Sendén, M., Lindqvist, A., Renström, E. A., Ryan, M. K., & Morton, T. A. (2021). Defending the sex/gender binary: The role of gender identification and need for closure. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 731-740.
    [Google Scholar]
45. NOS Nieuws (2024a, 7maart). Wapenexpert op filmset Rust schuldig bevonden aan fatale schietpartij. NOS Nieuws. https://nos.nl/artikel/2511763-wapenexpert-wapenexpert-op-filmset-rust-schuldig-bevonden-aan-fatale-schietpartij
    [Google Scholar]
46. NOS Nieuws (2024b, 10april). Franse vrouw breekt wereldrecord touwklimmen: In 18 minuten de Eiffeltoren op. NOS Nieuws. https://nos.nl/artikel/2516304-franse-vrouw-breekt-wereldrecord-touwklimmen-in-18-minuten-de-eiffeltoren-op
    [Google Scholar]
47. Pabst, L. M., & Kollmayer, M. (2023). How to make a difference: The impact of gender-fair language on text comprehensibility amongst adults with and without an academic background. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1234860.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Parks, J. B., & Roberton, M. A. (1998). Contemporary arguments against nonsexist language: Blaubergs (1980) revisited. Sex Roles, 39(5), 445-461.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Pöschko, H., & Prieler, V. (2018). Zur Verständlichkeit und Lesbarkeit von geschlechtergerecht formulierten Schulbuchtexten. Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung, 8(1), 5-18.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Renström, E. A., Lindqvist, A., & Gustafsson Sendén, M. (2022). The multiple meanings of the gender-inclusive pronoun hen: Predicting attitudes and use. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(1), 71-90.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Richards, C., Bouman, W. P., Seal, L., Barker, M. J., Nieder, T. O., & T’Sjoen, G. (2016). Non-binary or genderqueer genders. International Review of Psychiatry, 28(1), 95-102.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Saguy, A. C., & Williams, J. A. (2019). Reimagining gender: Gender neutrality in the news. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44(2), 465-489.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Sjøvaag, H., & Pedersen, T. A. (2019). Female voices in the news: Structural conditions of gender representations in Norwegian newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 215-238.
    [Google Scholar]
54. TaalUnie (2024). Taal en gender (algemeen). https://taaladvies.net/taal-en-gender-algemeen/
    [Google Scholar]
55. Taboada, M. (2024). Reported speech and gender in the news: Who is quoted, how are they quoted, and why it matters. Discourse & Communication, 19(1), 93-113.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Thornborrow, J. (2004). Language and the media. In L.Thomas & S.Wareing (Red.), Language, society and power: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 49-64). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426968
    [Google Scholar]
57. Trump, D. J. (2025, 20januari). Defending women from gender ideology extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government. [Executive order of the president of the United States]. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government
    [Google Scholar]
58. Van Caenegem, E., Wierckx, K., Elaut, E., Buysse, A., Dewaele, A., Van Nieuwerburgh, F., De Cuypere, G., & T’Sjoen, G. (2015). Prevalence of gender nonconformity in Flanders, Belgium. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(5), 1281-1287.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Van den Berg, C. (2017, 23juni). Progressief en conservatief: Wie is nu wie?De Nederlandse Grondwet. https://www.denederlandsegrondwet.nl/id/vkfbaic21bwf/nieuws/progressief_en_conservatief_wie_is_nu
    [Google Scholar]
60. Van der Pas, D. J., & Aaldering, L. (2020). Gender differences in political media coverage: A meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 70(1), 114-143.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Van Ditzhuijzen, J., & Motmans, J. (2020). Kennis en opvattingen over intersekse: Een nulmeting in Nederland en Vlaanderen. Rutgers & UZ Gent. https://open.overheid.nl/documenten/ronl-862b4568-3404-4fd6-af2e-2997e2b685e8/pdf
    [Google Scholar]
62. Van Krieken, K., Sanders, J., & Hoeken, H. (2015). Viewpoint representation in journalistic crime narratives: An analysis of grammatical roles and referential expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 88, 220-230.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Van Ravels, M., & Lagerwerf, L. (2010). Zoek de m/v-verschillen: Wat cijfers zeggen over beeldvorming in de pers. Tekstblad, 15(1), 26-29.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Van Zoonen, L. (1988). Rethinking women and the news. European Journal of Communication, 3(1), 35-53.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Verbiest, A. (1997). De oorbellen van de minister: Taal en denken over vrouwen. Atlas Contact.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Vergoossen, H. P., Pärnamets, P., Renström, E. A., & Gustafsson Sendén, M. (2020). Are new gender-neutral pronouns difficult to process in reading? The case of hen in Swedish. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 574356.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Vergoossen, H. P., Renström, E. A., Lindqvist, A., & Gustafsson Sendén, M. (2020). Four dimensions of criticism against gender-fair language. Sex Roles, 83, 328-337.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Weerman, F. (2025). Het verdriet van de talen. Metamorfoses van taal en talenstudies. Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Weyns, W. (2022). Wie wat woke? Een cultuurkritische benadering van wat we (on) rechtvaardig vinden. Pelckmans.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Yesilgöz-Zegerius, D. (2022, 12september). Doen wat nodig is om onze democratische rechtsstaat te beschermen. Veertiende HJ Schoolezing, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]